Re: row filtering for logical replication
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> + /*
> + * Unchanged toasted replica identity columns are only detoasted in the
> + * old tuple, copy this over to the new tuple.
> + */
> + if (att->attlen == -1 &&
> + VARATT_IS_EXTERNAL_ONDISK(tmp_new_slot->tts_values[i]) &&
> + !VARATT_IS_EXTERNAL_ONDISK(old_slot->tts_values[i]))
> + {
> + if (tmp_new_slot == new_slot)
> + {
> + tmp_new_slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(desc, &TTSOpsVirtual);
> + ExecClearTuple(tmp_new_slot);
> + ExecCopySlot(tmp_new_slot, new_slot);
> + }
> +
> + tmp_new_slot->tts_values[i] = old_slot->tts_values[i];
> + tmp_new_slot->tts_isnull[i] = old_slot->tts_isnull[i];
> + }
> + }
>
>
> What is the need to assign new_slot to tmp_new_slot at the beginning
> of this part of the code? Can't we do this when we found some
> attribute that needs to be copied from the old tuple?
>
> The other part which is not clear to me by looking at this code and
> comments is how do we ensure that we cover all cases where the new
> tuple doesn't have values?
>
IMHO, the only part we are trying to handle is when the toasted attribute
is not modified in the new tuple. And if we notice the update WAL the new
tuple is written as it is in the WAL which is getting inserted into the
heap page. That means if it is external it can only be in
VARATT_IS_EXTERNAL_ONDISK format. So I don't think we need to worry about
any intermediate format which we use for the in-memory tuples. Sometimes
in reorder buffer we do use the INDIRECT format as well which internally
can store ON DISK format but we don't need to worry about that case either
because that is only true when we have the complete toast tuple as part of
the WAL and we recreate the tuple in memory in reorder buffer, so even if
it can by ON DISK format inside INDIRECT format but we have complete tuple.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com