Re: row filtering for logical replication
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:29 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > Some more comments, > > In pgoutput_row_filter_update(), first, we are deforming the tuple in > local datum, then modifying the tuple, and then reforming the tuple. > I think we can surely do better here. Currently, you are reforming > the tuple so that you can store it in the scan slot by calling > ExecStoreHeapTuple which will be used for expression evaluation. > Instead of that what you need to do is to deform the tuple using > tts_values of the scan slot and later call ExecStoreVirtualTuple(), so > advantages are 1) you don't need to reform the tuple 2) the expression > evaluation machinery doesn't need to deform again for fetching the > value of the attribute, instead it can directly get from the value > from the virtual tuple. > I have one more question, while looking into the ExtractReplicaIdentity() function, it seems that if any of the "rep ident key" fields is changed then we will write all the key fields in the WAL as part of the old tuple, not just the changed fields. That means either the old tuple will be NULL or it will be having all the key attributes. So if we are supporting filter only on the "rep ident key fields" then is there any need to copy the fields from the new tuple to the old tuple? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com