Re: BUG #19026: ResourceOwnerForget can't find owner for invalid plancache
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Cc: exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-08-20T14:56:01Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix re-execution of a failed SQLFunctionCache entry.
- a67d4847a431 19 (unreleased) landed
- 906b68217a1e 18.0 landed
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 7:05 PM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 at 18:25, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 5:13 PM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote: > > > How about attached? > > > > Thanks, right it's better to clean up in sql_exec_error_callback. But > > we should still release the cached plan before setting it to NULL in > > order to leak the cache plan as I was doing in my patch. > > I am under the impression that we don’t. Resource owner will release > all cached plans in the rollback tx handler. > This can be confirmed via gdb session: print fcache->cplan in > sql_exec_error_callback and after this plan in ReleaseCachedPlan in > this repro. > These two pointers will be equal > That's a valid point. Thanks. I think we can add the same test case to what is given in this example, maybe in plpgsql.sql or maybe some other file which is more relevant. So we can continue with the v1 patch only you have sent, maybe you can add a one liner comment to it. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar Google