Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-07-20T11:26:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v10-0001-Convert-buf_internal.h-macros-to-static-inline-f.patch (text/x-patch) patch v10-0001
- v10-0002-Preliminary-refactoring-for-supporting-larger-re.patch (text/x-patch) patch v10-0002
- v10-0003-Remove-the-restriction-that-the-relmap-must-be-5.patch (text/x-patch) patch v10-0003
- v10-0004-Widen-relfilenumber-from-32-bits-to-56-bits.patch (text/x-patch) patch v10-0004
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was doing some more testing by setting the FirstNormalRelFileNumber > to a high value(more than 32 bits) I have noticed a couple of problems > there e.g. relpath is still using OIDCHARS macro which says max > relfilenumber file name can be only 10 character long which is no > longer true. So there we need to change this value to 20 and also > need to carefully rename the macros and other variable names used for > this purpose. > > Similarly there was some issue in macro in buf_internal.h while > fetching the relfilenumber. So I will relook into all those issues > and repost the patch soon. I have fixed these existing issues and there was also some issue in pg_dump.c which was creating problems in upgrading to the same version while using a higher range of the relfilenumber. There was also an issue where the user table from the old cluster's relfilenode could conflict with the system table of the new cluster. As a solution currently for system table object (while creating storage first time) we are keeping the low range of relfilenumber, basically we are using the same relfilenumber as OID so that during upgrade the normal user table from the old cluster will not conflict with the system tables in the new cluster. But with this solution Robert told me (in off list chat) a problem that in future if we want to make relfilenumber completely unique within a cluster by implementing the CREATEDB differently then we can not do that as we have created fixed relfilenodes for the system tables. I am not sure what exactly we can do to avoid that because even if we do something to avoid that in the new cluster the old cluster might be already using the non-unique relfilenode so after upgrading the new cluster will also get those non-unique relfilenode. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Fix typos in comments, code and documentation
- 33ab0a2a527e 16.0 cited
-
Increase width of RelFileNumbers from 32 bits to 56 bits.
- 05d4cbf9b6ba 16.0 landed
-
Move RelFileNumber declarations to common/relpath.h.
- 2f47715cc864 16.0 landed
-
Include RelFileLocator fields individually in BufferTag.
- 82ac34db2036 16.0 landed
-
Convert macros to static inline functions (buf_internals.h)
- 3ac88fddd92c 16.0 landed
-
Remove the restriction that the relmap must be 512 bytes.
- d8cd0c6c95c0 16.0 landed
-
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator.
- b0a55e43299c 16.0 landed
-
Reorder subskiplsn in pg_subscription to avoid alignment issues.
- 79b716cfb7a1 15.0 cited
-
Fix DROP {DATABASE,TABLESPACE} on Windows.
- 4eb2176318d0 15.0 cited
-
Restructure smgr API as per recent proposal. smgr no longer depends on
- 87bd95638552 8.0.0 cited