Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade

Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, smithpb2250@gmail.com, bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-07-10T04:13:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 9:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > What shall we do for exposed check_hook functions
> > check_max_slot_wal_keep_size() and
> > check_idle_replication_slot_timeout() in backbranch? Shall we remove
> > there as well or leave them to avoid the risk of breaking any
> > application?
>
> It's impossible to believe that any extension is calling those
> functions.

Right..

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google



Commits

  1. Fix the handling of two GUCs during upgrade.

  2. Rework how logirep launchers are stopped during pg_upgrade

  3. Prohibit max_slot_wal_keep_size to value other than -1 during upgrade.

  4. Prevent startup of logical replication launcher during pg_upgrade

  5. Migrate logical slots to the new node during an upgrade.