Re: UPDATE of partition key

Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-18T15:15:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12 September 2017 at 12:39, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 September 2017 at 11:57, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>

>> In the attached patch, we first call ExecARUpdateTriggers(), and while
>> doing that, we first save the info that a NEW row is already captured
>> (mtstate->mt_transition_capture->tcs_update_old_table == true). If it
>> captured, we pass NULL transition_capture pointer to
>> ExecARDeleteTriggers() (and ExecARInsertTriggers) so that it does not
>> again capture an extra row.
>>
>> Modified a testcase in update.sql by including DELETE statement
>> trigger that uses transition tables.
>
> Ok, this fix looks correct to me, I will review the latest patch.

Please find few more comments.

+ * in which they appear in the PartitionDesc. Also, extract the
+ * partition key columns of the root partitioned table. Those of the
+ * child partitions would be collected during recursive expansion.
*/
+ pull_child_partition_columns(&all_part_cols, oldrelation, oldrelation);
expand_partitioned_rtentry(root, rte, rti, oldrelation, oldrc,
  lockmode, &root->append_rel_list,
+   &all_part_cols,

pcinfo->all_part_cols is only used in case of update, I think we can
call pull_child_partition_columns
only if rte has updateCols?

@@ -2029,6 +2034,7 @@ typedef struct PartitionedChildRelInfo

Index parent_relid;
List   *child_rels;
+ Bitmapset  *all_part_cols;
} PartitionedChildRelInfo;

I might be missing something, but do we really need to store
all_part_cols inside the
PartitionedChildRelInfo,  can't we call pull_child_partition_columns
directly inside
inheritance_planner whenever we realize that RTE has some updateCols
and we want to
check the overlap?

+extern void partition_walker_init(PartitionWalker *walker, Relation rel);
+extern Relation partition_walker_next(PartitionWalker *walker,
+  Relation *parent);
+

I don't see these functions are used anywhere?

+typedef struct PartitionWalker
+{
+ List   *rels_list;
+ ListCell   *cur_cell;
+} PartitionWalker;
+

Same as above



-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Commits

  1. Avoid referencing off the end of subplan_partition_offsets.

  2. Allow UPDATE to move rows between partitions.

  3. Remove useless lookup of root partitioned rel in ExecInitModifyTable().

  4. Factor error generation out of ExecPartitionCheck.

  5. Minor preparatory refactoring for UPDATE row movement.

  6. Simplify and encapsulate tuple routing support code.

  7. Avoid coercing a whole-row variable that is already coerced.

  8. Use ResultRelInfo ** rather than ResultRelInfo * for tuple routing.

  9. Make RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo expand depth-first.

  10. Expand partitioned tables in PartDesc order.

  11. Use a real RT index when setting up partition tuple routing.

  12. Fix transition tables for partition/inheritance.

  13. Fix confusion about number of subplans in partitioned INSERT setup.

  14. Prevent BEFORE triggers from violating partitioning constraints.

  15. Fire per-statement triggers on partitioned tables.

  16. Fix reporting of violations in ExecConstraints, again.

  17. Don't scan partitioned tables.

  18. Allow FDWs to push down quals without breaking EvalPlanQual rechecks.