Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-05-05T03:57:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Tighten the concurrent abort check during decoding.

  2. Improve hash_create()'s API for some added robustness.

  3. Use HASH_BLOBS for xidhash.

  4. Fix initialization of RelationSyncEntry for streaming transactions.

  5. Remove unused function declaration in logicalproto.h.

  6. Add additional tests to test streaming of in-progress transactions.

  7. Fix inline marking introduced in commit 464824323e.

  8. Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.

  9. Fix the SharedFileSetUnregister API.

  10. Fix comment in procarray.c

  11. Suppress compiler warning in non-cassert builds.

  12. Extend the BufFile interface.

  13. Mark a few logical decoding related variables with PGDLLIMPORT.

  14. Implement streaming mode in ReorderBuffer.

  15. Extend the logical decoding output plugin API with stream methods.

  16. WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.

  17. Immediately WAL-log subtransaction and top-level XID association.

  18. Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.

  19. Only superuser can set sslcert/sslkey in postgres_fdw user mappings

  20. Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.

  21. Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.

  22. logical decoding: process ASSIGNMENT during snapshot build

  23. Emit invalidations to standby for transactions without xid.

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:16 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 8:41 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >

> 5. Shouldn't we add a check in table_scan_sample_next_block and
> table_scan_sample_next_tuple APIs as well?

I am not sure that we need to do that,  Because generally, we want to
avoid getting any wrong system table tuple which we can use for taking
some decision or decode tuple.  But, I don't think that
table_scan_sample falls under that category.


> > Apart from this, I have also fixed one defect raised by my colleague
> > Neha Sharma.  That issue is the incomplete toast tuple flag was not
> > reset when the main table tuple was inserted through speculative
> > insert and due to that data was not streamed even if later we were
> > getting speculative confirm because incomplete toast flag was never
> > reset.  This patch also includes the fix for the issue raised by Erik.
> >
>
> It would be better if you can mention which all patches contain the
> changes as it will be easier to review the fix.

Fix1: v17-0010-Bugfix-handling-of-incomplete-toast-tuple.patch
Fix2:  patch: v17-0002-Issue-individual-invalidations-with-wal_level-lo.patch

I will work on other comments and send the updated patch.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com