Re: pgsql: Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little better
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-27T11:09:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:20 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:11 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > v5-0001, incorporates all the comment fixes suggested by Alvaro. and > > > 0001 is an additional patch which moves > > > MarkCurrentTransactionIdLoggedIfAny(), out of the critical section. > > > > > > > Thanks, both your patches look good to me except that we need to > > remove the sentence related to the revert of ade24dab97 from the > > commit message. I think we should backpatch the first patch to 14 > > where it was introduced and commit the second patch (related to moving > > code out of critical section) only to HEAD but we can even backpatch > > the second one till 9.6 for the sake of consistency. What do you guys > > think? > > > > The other option could be to just commit both these patches in HEAD as > there is no correctness issue here. Right, even I feel we should just commit it to the HEAD as there is no correctness issue. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Move MarkCurrentTransactionIdLoggedIfAny() out of the critical section.
- 335397456b7e 15.0 landed
-
Replace XLOG_INCLUDE_XID flag with a more localized flag.
- 71db6459e6e4 15.0 landed
-
Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little better
- c1d1ae1db237 14.0 cited
- ade24dab97a2 15.0 cited
-
Immediately WAL-log subtransaction and top-level XID association.
- 0bead9af484c 14.0 cited