Horton

Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto

Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-28T04:22:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 8:14 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > LOG:  level: 1; AV worker: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 7928 free (0 chunks); 264 used
>
> Good catch. I've seen the use of "AV" in some of the mem context
> names, why that? Let's be specific and say "Autovacuum". Attached
> patch does that. Please review it.

+1, the error message and other improvements look good.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. autovacuum: Improve wording in a couple places