Re: row filtering for logical replication
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:37 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Adding a patch that strives to do the logic that I described above. > > For updates, the row filter is applied on both old_tuple > > and new_tuple. This patch assumes that the row filter only uses > > columns that are part of the REPLICA IDENTITY. (the current patch-set > > only > > restricts this for row-filters that are delete only) > > The old_tuple only has columns that are part of the old_tuple and have > > been changed, which is a problem while applying the row-filter. Since > > unchanged REPLICA IDENTITY columns > > are not present in the old_tuple, this patch creates a temporary > > old_tuple by getting such column values from the new_tuple and then > > applies the filter on this hand-created temp old_tuple. The way the > > old_tuple is created can be better optimised in future versions. I understand why this is done, but I have 2 concerns here 1) We are having extra deform and copying the field from new to old in case it is unchanged replica identity. 2) The same unchanged attribute values get qualified in the old tuple as well as in the new tuple. What exactly needs to be done is that the only updated field should be validated as part of the old as well as the new tuple, the unchanged field does not make sense to have redundant validation. For that we will have to change the filter for the old tuple to just validate the attributes which are actually modified and remaining unchanged and new values will anyway get validated in the new tuple. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com