Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>,
Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-24T10:18:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 11:42 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 3:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Nisha for the review. All your comments make sense so I have > > fixed them in the latest patch. > > > > Hi Dilip, > > Before we resume review, could you summarize any pending design points > (if any) from our last discussion? Sorry, I have lost track, a summary > will help. Thanks Shveta, IIRC, there were no open design point, the last problem were related to user should not be able to modify the internally created conflict log table and for that we designed a pg_conflict schema. So maybe we can dig a bit deeper on this part related to whether we are ensuring all right sort of permissions on this schema. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar Google
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow logical replication conflicts to be logged to a table.
- a5918fddf10d master landed
-
Avoid orphaned objects dependencies
- 2fbb21170e90 19 (unreleased) cited