Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall

Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>

From: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>

To: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>

Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, bungina@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org

Date: 2023-10-30T15:26:39Z

Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers

Attachments

v7-0001-pg_rewind-wal-deletion.patch (text/x-patch) patch v7-0001

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 08:50, torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:

>
> I have very minor questions on the regression tests mainly regarding the
> consistency with other tests for pg_rewind:
>

Please find attached a new version of the patch. It addresses all your
comments.

Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin

Commits

Fix newly introduced 010_keep_recycled_wals.pl
- 2fb3919356fb 17.3 landed
- 50010c6f6c4d 16.7 landed
- 93d8d4fe1255 15.11 landed
- 1c5fe56bc259 14.16 landed
- b5be29ecafe1 18.0 landed
Avoid deleting critical WAL segments during pg_rewind
- ea1649c352f6 16.6 landed
- e28cf2fbc222 15.10 landed
- cb844d66b587 17.2 landed
- ba25358413e4 14.15 landed
- 90bcc7c2db1d 18.0 landed