Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>
From: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-05-20T21:32:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 4:04 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > With "yet to see any significant changes" do you mean that the runs are > comparable with earlier runs, showing the same regression? Or that the > regression vanished? Or ...? > I mean that I might be chasing noise and the mean+stddev for throughput in version 16 pre-beta so far appears to be similar to 15.2. When I ran the insert benchmark a few times, I focused on the cases where 16 pre-beta was worse than 15.2 while ignoring the cases where it was better. Big regressions are easy to document, small ones not so much. Regardless, I am repeating tests from both the insert benchmark and sysbench for version 16 (pre-beta, and soon beta1).
Commits
-
Add back SQLValueFunction for SQL keywords
- d8c3106bb60e 16.0 landed
-
Add missing TAP test name
- 1ab763fc22ad 16.0 cited
-
Have the planner consider Incremental Sort for DISTINCT
- 3c6fc58209f2 16.0 cited