Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16

MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>

From: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-05-19T22:44:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 10:36 AM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have two more runs of the benchmark in progress so we will have 3
>> results for each of the test cases to confirm that the small regressions
>> are repeatable.
>>
>
I repeated the benchmark a few times using a more recent PG16 build (git
sha 08c45ae2) and have yet to see any significant changes. So that is good
news. My testing scripts have been improved so I should be able to finish
the next round of tests in less time.

--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag@gmail.com

Commits

  1. Add back SQLValueFunction for SQL keywords

  2. Add missing TAP test name

  3. Have the planner consider Incremental Sort for DISTINCT