Re: parallel-processing multiple similar query tasks - any example?
Erik Brandsberg <erik@heimdalldata.com>
From: Erik Brandsberg <erik@heimdalldata.com>
To: Shaozhong SHI <shishaozhong@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Midgley <science@misuse.org>,
pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-04-28T18:22:25Z
Lists: pgsql-sql
None of this discussion is really specific to postgres. On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:46 PM Shaozhong SHI <shishaozhong@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 18:15, Steve Midgley <science@misuse.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:34 PM Shaozhong SHI <shishaozhong@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> multiple similar query tasks are as follows: >>> >>> select * from a_table where country ='UK' >>> select * from a_table where country='France' >>> and so on >>> >>> How best to parallel-processing such types of multiple similar query >>> tasks? >>> >>> >>> This depends on how you are engaging with the queries when they return >> results. Let's assume you are running them from a programming environment >> with an ORM layer. In that case you can run each query in a separate thread >> and connection pipe, and the queries will run async just fine. If you are >> running at the command line using psql, you can just open multiple shells >> and run each query from a different shell terminal. >> >> Postgres is very good at async queries, so your challenge is really >> figuring out how you will use the results of each query and setting up the >> environment sending the queries to perform asynchronously. >> >> Steve >> > > Hi, Steve, > > That is very useful. > > All we want to do is to process a large amount of data. > > I found loops of recursive queries are very time consuming and will not > finish on time. > > Measures like indexing are simply not adequate to address the problem. > > I am thinking of making use of Linux capability to fire off concurrent > processors. > > So long as it is efficient, we can always work out how to ask it to return > results. > > Regards, > > David >