Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>,
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-04-05T17:54:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-seqam-2016-04-05.patch (text/x-diff) patch 0001
- 0002-gapless-seq-2016-04-05.patch (text/x-diff) patch 0002
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> I have just one question about de 0002 patch: >> - There are some reason to not use TransactionId instead of uint32 in >> GaplessSequenceState struct? >> > > I missed we have that :) > Attached fix it and also I changed to use TransactionIdEquals instead of compare xids directly. - if (seqstate->xid != local_xid) + if (!TransactionIdEquals(seqstate->xid, local_xid)) IMHO this patch is Ready for Commiter. Changed status in CommitfestApp. Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited