Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>,
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-04-04T13:53:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-seqam-2016-04-04.patch (text/x-diff) patch 0001
- 0002-gapless-seq-2016-04-04.patch (text/x-diff) patch 0002
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > new version attached that should fix the issue. It was alignment - honestly don't know what I was thinking using fixed alignment when the AMs can define their own type. > Yeah... now all works fine... I had a minor issue when apply to the current master but the attached fix it and I also added tab-complete support for CREATE SEQUENCE...USING and ALTER SEQUENCE...USING. I ran all the regression tests and all passed. I have just one question about de 0002 patch: - There are some reason to not use TransactionId instead of uint32 in GaplessSequenceState struct? Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
Commits
-
Add missing gss option to msvc config template
- 3063e7a84026 9.6.0 cited