Re: Batch TIDs lookup in ambulkdelete

Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>

From: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>

To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-06-09T22:24:23Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/06/25 18:34, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
> Thank you for the report. With the 0001 and 0002 patches, I got a
> SEGV. I've fixed this issue in the attached updated version patches.
> I've confirmed that the patches pass CI tests but I'm not sure it
> fixes the shared memory segment leak problem you reported. The
> attached patches incorporated the comments[1] from John as well.
>

Thanks for the new version. I've tested the v3 version attached on [1]
and I can confirm that the tests are now passing and I can't see the
shared memory issues that I've mentioned on v1.

Thanks!

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAcfp5kdcsT5727Vw4JF-Rw7b73zXh_GwXqNHg3P7-UoA%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
Matheus Alcantara