Re: row filtering for logical replication
Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
Attachments
- v30-0001-Row-filter-for-logical-replication.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v30-0001
- v30-0002-Support-updates-based-on-old-and-new-tuple-in-ro.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v30-0002
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:05 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:50 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 6:42 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Why do you think that the second assumption (if there is an old tuple > > it will contain all RI key fields.) is broken? It seems to me even > > when we are planning to include unchanged toast as part of old_key, it > > will contain all the key columns, isn't that true? > > Yes, I assumed wrongly. Just checked. What you say is correct. > > > > > > I think we > > > still need to deform both old tuple and new tuple, just to handle this case. > > > > > > > Yeah, but we will anyway talking about saving that cost for later if > > we decide to send that tuple. I think we can further try to optimize > > it by first checking whether the new tuple has any toasted value, if > > so then only we need this extra pass of deforming. > > Ok, I will go ahead with this approach. > > > > > > There is currently logic in ReorderBufferToastReplace() which already > > > deforms the new tuple > > > to detoast changed toasted fields in the new tuple. I think if we can > > > enhance this logic for our > > > purpose, then we can avoid an extra deform of the new tuple. > > > But I think you had earlier indicated that having untoasted unchanged > > > values in the new tuple > > > can be bothersome. > > > > > > > I think it will be too costly on the subscriber side during apply > > because it will update all the unchanged toasted values which will > > lead to extra writes both for WAL and data. > > Based on the discussion above, I've added two more slot pointers in the RelationSyncEntry structure to store tuples that have been deformed. Once the tuple (old and new) is deformed , then it is stored in the structure, where it can be retrieved while writing to the stream.I have also changed the logic so that the old tuple is not populated, as Dilip pointed out, it will have all the RI columns if it is changed. I've added two new APIs in proto.c for writing tuple cached and writing update cached. These are called if the the slots contain previously deformed tuples. I have for now also rebased the patch and merged the first 5 patches into 1, and added my changes for the above into the second patch. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia