Horton

Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-01-23T05:38:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:16 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I think so. But do you have any reason to believe that it won't be
> required anymore?

A temporary slot will not clash with a permanent slot of the same name,

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu

Commits

  1. Fix relcache reference leak introduced by ce0fdbfe97.

  2. Fix Subscription test added by commit ce0fdbfe97.

  3. Allow multiple xacts during table sync in logical replication.

  4. Logical replication support for initial data copy