Horton
Menu

Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication

Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, surya poondla <suryapoondla4@gmail.com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-09T04:24:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 1:31 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ajin. Would you be able to share the timing of test (complete
> file) as well with this change in testfile.

There was a small typo in the file I shared. (fixed and updated)

The times are:

# +++ tap check in src/test/recovery +++
[14:22:31] t/053_synchronized_standby_slots_quorum.pl .. ok     6453
ms ( 0.01 usr  0.00 sys +  0.36 cusr  0.49 csys =  0.86 CPU)
[14:22:37]
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=14,  6 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.36 cusr
 0.49 csys =  0.87 CPU)
Result: PASS

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia