Horton

Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions

Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-04-09T02:59:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:23 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:

>
> I didn't like this style because it is not descriptive enough. It is also
> not a
> style adopted by Postgres. I suggest to add something like "This field was
> introduced in version 2" or "This field is available since version 2"
> after the
> field description.
>

I have updated this to  "Since protocol version 2"

>
> +                Xid of the sub-transaction (will be same as xid of the
> transaction for top-level
> +                transactions).
> +</para>
>
> Although, sub-transaction is also used in the documentation, I suggest to
> use
> subtransaction. Maybe change the other sub-transaction occurrences too.
>

Updated.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

Commits

  1. doc: Update information of new messages for logical replication.