Re: pg_reorg in core?

Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>
To: sakamoto <dsakamoto@lolloo.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-09-22T01:02:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
If the present project is having a tough time doing enhancements, I should
think it mighty questionable to try to draw it into core, that presses it
towards a group of already very busy developers.

On the other hand, if the present development efforts can be made more
public, by having them take place in a more public repository, that at
least has potential to let others in the community see and participate.
There are no guarantees, but privacy is liable to hurt.

I wouldn't expect any sudden huge influx of developers, but a steady
visible stream of development effort would be mighty useful to a "merge
into core" argument.

A *lot* of projects are a lot like this.  On the Slony project, we have
tried hard to maintain this sort of visibility.  Steve Singer, Jan Wieck
and I do our individual efforts on git repos visible at GitHub to ensure
ongoing efforts aren't invisible inside a corporate repo.  It hasn't led to
any massive of extra developers, but I am always grateful to see Peter
Eisentraut's bug reports.