Re: Improved TAP tests by replacing sub-optimal uses of ok() with better Test::More functions
Sadhuprasad Patro <b.sadhu@gmail.com>
From: Sadhuprasad Patro <b.sadhu@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-04T06:50:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve TAP tests by replacing ok() with better Test::More functions
- fabb33b351c2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix matching check in recovery test 042_low_level_backup
- 61b5fa029a43 17.7 landed
- 3a7225ed37fc 18.1 landed
- d1b80a31ed6d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
pg_createsubscriber: Fix matching check in TAP test
- 39e22b3adaa7 18.1 landed
- d372888ade9e 19 (unreleased) landed
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 6:19 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 05:00:27PM +0530, Sadhuprasad Patro wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 11:11 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
> > wrote:
> >> -ok($node->log_contains(qr/no SSL error reported/) == 0,
> >> +is($node->log_contains(qr/no SSL error reported/), 0
> >>
> >> The CI was failing with the change in the SSL tests, as of:
> >> [05:03:12.647] # at
> >> /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/ssl/t/001_ssltests.pl line 127.
> >> [05:03:12.647] # got: ''
> >> [05:03:12.647] # expected: '0'
>
> Sadhuprasad, there was still a bit more we could do. Related to this
> issue with the SSL test, what do you think about the introduction of a
> log_contains_like() in Cluster.pm where we would directly call like()
> in the subroutine? This way, we would be able to report in the output
> the contents of the server logs we are trying to match (or not match)
> with a pattern, making debugging easier. What do you think?
> --
> Michael
>
Hi Michael,
I think we can do this as you suggested...
I can define something like below in perl script and try to use:
*sub log_contains_like { my ($self, $pattern, $msg, $do_test) = @_;
my $log = $self->get_log(); $msg //= "Log output matches pattern"; #
Run as test by default if (!defined $do_test || $do_test) { my
$ok = like($log, $pattern, $msg); # If the test failed, show a
concise log snippet unless ($ok) { my @lines = split
/\n/, $log; my $snippet;*
* $snippet = $log; diag("Log snippet
(last " . scalar(@lines > 20 ? 20 : @lines) . " lines):");*
* diag($snippet); } } else { # Return
boolean for manual usage return ($log =~ /$pattern/); }}*
Is this looks fine to you?
Will share a new patch soon with this content...
Thank you
SadhuPrasad,
EnterpriseDB.