Fwd: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com>
From: Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-01-29T01:41:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v2-0001-Handle-local-buffer-cases-properly.patch (application/x-patch) patch v2-0001
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com> writes: > > as suggested did the changes and attached the patch for the same. > > Uh ... what in the world is the point of changing > BufferIsExclusiveLocked's signature? > > as suggested did not change the BufferIsExclusiveLocked's signature and here's the patch for the same. Regards, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla, EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
Commits
-
Make BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty work for local buffers.
- f6ff75f79689 18.0 landed