Horton

Re: i.e. and e.g.

John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-07-21T03:20:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
wrote:
> By the way, I forgot about back-branches. Don't we need to fix the
> same in back-branches?

The intent of the messages is pretty clear to me, so I don't really see a
need to change back branches. It does make sense for v15, though, and I
just forgot to consider that.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Correct some uses of e.g. and i.e. in message strings and documentation