Re: Test cluster with high OIDs above the signed-int limit (2B+)

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 3:23 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's an unsigned integer, so I'd say not use signed ints when processing OIDs.

Well duh, that's why it's a bug.
But it's a sneaky bug, because clusters rarely enter that high-OID territory.
That's precisely why I'd like a way to provoke it.

> It's a valid question, though, what happens when the OID counter wraps around and hits a duplicate.

Again, I'm NOT interested in OID wrap-around. But the "second-half" of
the OID space.