Re: Improvements and additions to COPY progress reporting

Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Date: 2021-02-21T19:10:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 07:09, Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  For COPY TO the name "source_type" column and for COPY FROM the name
> "destination_type" makes sense. To have a combined column name for
> both, how about naming that column as "io_type"?

Thank you, that's way better! PFA what I believe is a finalized
patchset v9, utilizing io_type terminology instead of io_target.


With regards,

Matthias van de Meent

Commits

  1. Add some basic tests for progress reporting of COPY

  2. Add support for more progress reporting in COPY

  3. doc: Add backlinks to progress reporting documentation