Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 at 13:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2026-Mar-16, Antonin Houska wrote: > > > One more problem related to the replication slot is that, due to the call of > > CheckSlotPermissions() in setup_logical_decoding(), REPLICATION privilege is > > required for REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) to run. That's not too user-friendly. > > > > I think the reason to require the REPLICATION privilege is that, in generic > > case, the output plugin can access data of any table in the database. However > > REPACK uses one particular plugin and that plugin only decodes changes of one > > particular table. Thus I think we don't really need to call > > CheckSlotPermissions(). Do I seem to miss something? > > Yeah, I don't think it makes sense to require REPLICATION privilege to > run REPACK. I don't think it makes sense to allow just any table owner to modify the effective_wal_level GUC; which is what the effect would be of removing the REPLICATION requirement from roles that want to REPACK CONCURRENTLY -- and in doing so create logical slots, which increase effective_wal_level to logical. Creating a replication slot requires REPLICATION privilege, because it consumes a (possibly very) limited server resource that can't be increased without restart and because it impacts other backends' WAL performance through effective_wal_level. Allowing users to consume said resource without first having the appropriate permissions makes this flag practically meaningless. Note that most of my argument hinges on the impact on other, unrelated databases/tables/sessions. Replication slots have a hard cap defined at startup, and effective_wal_level increases the WAL generated by practically all backends. If replication slot counts were SIGHUP, and RelationIsLogicallyLogged() returned true only in databases with LR slots, and only for the tables actually present in publications, I'd consider this much less problematic. However, we don't live in that world, so I am opposed to allowing table owners without REPLICATION to take any/all replication slots. Matthias van de Meent Databricks (https://www.databricks.com)
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY
- 45b02984e2fa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation
- 38470c2c1ea7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unnecessary signal handler change
- 5d48d3b14e0e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more
- 378dffaf8c80 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"
- 01a80f062146 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests
- 4b2aa4b39cba 19 (unreleased) landed
-
REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN
- 5dbb63fc82b7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add missing initialization
- 05c401d5786a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify declaration of memcpy target
- 2cff363715ef 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK
- e76d8c749c31 19 (unreleased) landed
-
doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)
- 8fb95a8ab6e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific
- 0d3dba38c777 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast
- a3b069ef90bd 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix valgrind failure
- 5bcc3fbd196c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK
- 28d534e2ae0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)
- c0b53ec06309 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting
- caec9d9fadf1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general
- 33bf7318f94c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack
- a630ac5c2016 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce the REPACK command
- ac58465e0618 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h
- c4067383cb2c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.
- 08e6344fd642 17.0 cited
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 cited
-
VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY
- d9d076222f5b 14.0 cited