Re: Proposal: Make cfbot fail on patches not created by "git format-patch"

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-05-30T04:18:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:45 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl> wrote:

> On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 12:24, Jacob Champion
> <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:12 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > That outcome seems entirely horrible to me.  If you want to flag the
> lack
> > > of a commit message somehow, fine, but don't prevent CI from running.
> >
> > Personally I also prefer nudges to gates.
>
> Okay, reasonable feedback. How about we add a CI job that does a
> "quality check". That's much less strong, as all the other tests will
> still run, but people would get a failing CI job which tells them that
> something is wrong. We could also include a pgindent in that CI job.
>
>
> +1. Knowing whether to use git am or patch to apply the patch itself will
save reviewers' time.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat