Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-04-09T07:50:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove PG_MMAP_FLAGS from mem.h
- c100340729b6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve runtime and output of tests for replication slots checkpointing.
- 4464fddf7b50 18.0 cited
-
Revert support for improved tracking of nested queries
- f85f6ab051b7 18.0 cited
-
Use exported symbols list on macOS for loadable modules as well
- 3feff3916ee1 18.0 cited
-
Add support for basic NUMA awareness
- 65c298f61fc7 18.0 cited
-
Avoid unnecessary copying of a string in pg_restore.c
- 5e1915439085 18.0 cited
-
aio: Infrastructure for io_method=worker
- 55b454d0e140 18.0 cited
-
Improve InitShmemAccess() prototype
- 2a7b2d97171d 18.0 landed
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:15 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:12:18AM GMT, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:13 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In the new v4 version > > > of the patch the first option is implemented. > > > > > > > The patches don't apply cleanly using git am but patch -p1 applies > > them cleanly. However I see following compilation errors > > RuntimeError: command "ninja" failed with error > > Becase it's relatively meaningless to apply a patch to the tip of the > master around the release freeze time :) Commit 65c298f61fc has > introduced new usage of GetHugePageSize, which was modified in my patch. > I'm going to address it with the next rebased version, in the meantime > you can always use the specified base commit to apply the changeset: > > base-commit: 5e1915439085014140314979c4dd5e23bd677cac There is a higher chance that people will try these patches now than it was two days before and more chance if they find the patches applicable easily. ../../coderoot/pg/src/include/storage/s_lock.h:93:2: error: #error "s_lock.h may not be included from frontend code" How about this? Why is that happening? -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat