Horton

Re: DOCS - pg_replication_slot . Fix the 'inactive_since' description

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, "amit.kapila16@gmail.com" <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, "shveta.malik@gmail.com" <shveta.malik@gmail.com>, "smithpb2250@gmail.com" <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-09-04T13:18:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 11:34 AM David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Agree on sticking with “The time…”
>
> Thus I suggest either:
>
> The time when the slot became inactive.

+1. Definitely removes confusion caused by "since" and keeps The time
as subject.




-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Commits

  1. Doc: Clarify the `inactive_since` field description.

  2. Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.