Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 3:26 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > > > I don't plan to get rid of the legacy API any time soon, I expect > existing extensions to continue using it for years to come. So I moved > them per your suggestion. Do you plan to get rid of the shmem_request_hook and shmem_startup_hook? What's the plan there? Wouldn't the old APIs and new APIs overwhelm extension writers - having two different ways and three different hooks to allocate a structure in the shared memory. > > > ShmemInitStruct() now calls ShmemRegisterStruct(). Earlier it could be > > called from any backend, in any state to fetch a pointer to a shared > > memory structure. It didn't add a new structure. Now it can add a new > > structure. I am wondering whether that can cause registry in different > > backends to get out of sync. Should we limit the window when it can be > > called just like how shmem_request_hook call is limited. In that sense > > ShmemRegisterStruct() looks something to be called from a > > shmem_register_hook which is also called from EXEC_BACKEND. Sorry to > > expand it here rather in my previous reply. In case we replace all the > > current calls to ShmemInitStruct() with ShmemRegisterStruct(), we may > > be able to get rid of the Shmem Index altogether; after all it's used > > only for fetching the pointers to the shared memory areas in > > EXEC_BACKEND mode. > > I think it's still useful to allow ShmemRegisterStruct() after > postmaster startup, so that you can use it with extensions that are not > listed in shared_preload_libraries, but need a little bit of shared > memory. Hmm, perhaps we should add an explicit flag for that case, > though. So that by default ShmemRegisterStruct() fails if you call it > after postmaster startup, but you could allow it by setting a flag in > the descriptor. > The hash tables do not allocate all their entries upfront but they request shared memory for their maximum size. Before they could grow to the maximum of their size, if somebody calls ShmemInitStruct with a huge memory size request that takes away all the reserved address space/memory, the hash table won't get its fair share of shared memory. I agree that it could still happen if a hash table grows beyond the contracted request ... but it's atleast registered. I think we should prevent such cases. We could keep track of the extra shared memory that we have allocated and refuse an unregistered request if that memory is exhausted. But I think we already have some unaccounted for structures e.g. ShmemAllocator and ShmemHeader already. So it might turn out to be more complex that required. I have feeling that we are providing flexibility that the current infrastructure can not support. I am not opposed to supporting ShmemRegisterStruct; I like the idea, but it seems premature. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Tidy up #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS guards
- 9480c585df6c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert all remaining subsystems to use the new shmem allocation API
- 9b5acad3f40f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert buffer manager to use the new shmem allocation functions
- a4b6139dcceb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add alignment option to ShmemRequestStruct()
- dacfe81a0de5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert AIO to use the new shmem allocation functions
- 58a1573385ed 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert SLRUs to use the new shmem allocation functions
- 2e0943a8597e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor shmem initialization code in predicate.c
- 4c9eca5afea0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use the new shmem allocation functions in a few core subsystems
- c6d55714ba4c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert lwlock.c to use the new shmem allocation functions
- a006bc7b1699 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce a registry of built-in shmem subsystems
- 1fc2e9fbc0a3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert pg_stat_statements to use the new shmem allocation functions
- d4885af3d653 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test module to test after-startup shmem allocations
- 6409994c7dd8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce a new mechanism for registering shared memory areas
- 283e823f9dcb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move some code from shmem.c and shmem.h
- 6ef9bee29310 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve test_lwlock_tranches
- 92a685e4070d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Test pg_stat_statements across crash restart
- 148fe2b05df5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor PredicateLockShmemInit to not reuse var for different things
- 3fd057772827 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor ShmemIndex initialization
- 6b8238cb6aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a new shmem_request_hook hook.
- 4f2400cb3f10 15.0 cited