Horton

Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-28T11:20:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 4:05 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > No, that's losing some information like default installation and the
> > same version.
>
> You don't need to preserve such information.  This is just a test name.
> People looking for more details can grep for the name and they will find
> the comments.

Ok. In that case what's wrong with the testname I have in the patch?

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Commits

  1. Hide expensive pg_upgrade test behind PG_TEST_EXTRA

  2. Set log_statement=none in t/002_pg_upgrade.pl

  3. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: Move pg_dump test code for better stability

  4. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: rename some variables for clarity

  5. Verify roundtrip dump/restore of regression database

  6. Refactor TAP test code for file comparisons into new routine in Utils.pm

  7. Virtual generated columns

  8. Put generated_stored test objects in a schema

  9. Introduce "builtin" collation provider.

  10. Revert "Improve compression and storage support with inheritance"