Re: row filtering for logical replication
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:18 PM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Friday, December 3, 2021 10:09 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:32 PM tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com > > <tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, December 2, 2021 5:21 AM Peter Smith > > <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > PSA the v44* set of patches. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the new patch. Few comments: > > > > > > 1. This is an example in publication doc, but in fact it's not allowed. Should we > > > change this example? > > > > > > +CREATE PUBLICATION active_departments FOR TABLE departments WHERE > > (active IS TRUE); > > > > > > postgres=# CREATE PUBLICATION active_departments FOR TABLE departments > > WHERE (active IS TRUE); > > > ERROR: invalid publication WHERE expression for relation "departments" > > > HINT: only simple expressions using columns, constants and immutable system > > functions are allowed > > > > > > > Thanks for finding this. Actually, the documentation looks correct to > > me. The problem was the validation walker of patch 0002 was being > > overly restrictive. It needed to also allow a BooleanTest node. > > > > Now it works (locally) for me. For example. > > > > test_pub=# create table departments(depno int primary key, active boolean); > > CREATE TABLE > > test_pub=# create publication pdept for table departments where > > (active is true) with (publish="insert"); > > CREATE PUBLICATION > > test_pub=# create publication pdept2 for table departments where > > (active is false) with (publish="insert"); > > CREATE PUBLICATION > > > > This fix will be available in v45*. > > > > Thanks for looking into it. > > I have another problem with your patch. The document says: > > ... If the subscription has several publications in > + which the same table has been published with different filters, those > + expressions get OR'ed together so that rows satisfying any of the expressions > + will be replicated. Notice this means if one of the publications has no filter > + at all then all other filters become redundant. > > Then, what if one of the publications is specified as 'FOR ALL TABLES' or 'FOR > ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA'. > > For example: > create table tbl (a int primary key);" > create publication p1 for table tbl where (a > 10); > create publication p2 for all tables; > create subscription sub connection 'dbname=postgres port=5432' publication p1, p2; Thanks for the example. I was wondering about this case myself. > > I think for "FOR ALL TABLE" publication(p2 in my case), table tbl should be > treated as no filter, and table tbl should have no filter in subscription sub. Thoughts? > > But for now, the filter(a > 10) works both when copying initial data and later changes. > > To fix it, I think we can check if the table is published in a 'FOR ALL TABLES' > publication or published as part of schema in function pgoutput_row_filter_init > (which was introduced in v44-0003 patch), also we need to make some changes in > tablesync.c. In order to check "FOR ALL_TABLES", we might need to fetch publication metdata. Instead of that can we add a "TRUE" filter on all the tables which are part of FOR ALL TABLES publication? -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat