Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-14T16:15:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- improve-partition-links_v2.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:49 PM Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:
> This patch adds a link to the "attach partition" command section
> (similar to the detach partition link above it) as well as a link to
> "create table like" as both commands contain additional information
> that users should review beyond what is laid out in this section.
> There's also a couple of wordsmiths in nearby areas to improve
> readability.
>
Thanks.
The patch gives error when building html
ddl.sgml:4300: element link: validity error : No declaration for attribute
linked of element link
<link linked="sql-createtable-parms-like"><literal>CREATE TABLE ...
LIKE</l
^
ddl.sgml:4300: element link: validity error : Element link does not carry
attribute linkend
nked="sql-createtable-parms-like"><literal>CREATE TABLE ...
LIKE</literal></link
^
make[1]: *** [Makefile:72: postgres-full.xml] Error 4
make[1]: *** Deleting file 'postgres-full.xml'
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/ashutosh/work/units/pg_review/coderoot/pg/doc/src/sgml'
make: *** [Makefile:8: html] Error 2
I have fixed in the attached.
- As an alternative, it is sometimes more convenient to create the
- new table outside the partition structure, and attach it as a
+ As an alternative, it is sometimes more convenient to create a
+ new table outside of the partition structure, and attach it as a
it uses article "the" for "new table" since it's referring to the partition
mentioned in the earlier example. I don't think using "a" is correct.
"outside" seems better than "outside of". See
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/9700/outside-or-outside-of. But
I think the meaning of the sentence will be more clear if we rephrase it as
in the attached patch.
- convenient, as not only will the existing partitions become indexed,
but
- also any partitions that are created in the future will. One
limitation is
+ convenient as not only will the existing partitions become indexed,
but
+ any partitions created in the future will as well. One limitation is
I am finding the current construct hard to read. The comma is misplaced as
you have pointed out. The pair of commas break the "not only" ... "but
also" construct. I have tried to simplify the sentence in the attached.
Please review.
- the partitioned table; such an index is marked invalid, and the
partitions
- do not get the index applied automatically. The indexes on
partitions can
- be created individually using <literal>CONCURRENTLY</literal>, and
then
+ the partitioned table; such an index is marked invalid and the
partitions
+ do not get the index applied automatically. The partition indexes can
"indexes on partition" is clearer than "partition index". Fixed in the
attached patch.
Please review.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
Commits
-
doc: Improve "Partition Maintenance" section
- 056c56574274 17.0 landed