Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-07-09T13:19:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-Some-more-clarifications-for-non-PG-subscri-20250709.patch (text/x-patch) patch 0001
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have split your top up patch into 2 - one related to the document > > change being the subject of this thread and the other for fixing the > > query. Committer may squash the patch, if they think so. > > > > The changes look good to me. Thanks. Looks like Amit has already committed it. I had created a CF entry https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5904/ to track this. I will mark it as committed now. Amit, While reviewing the patches again, I felt that the second sentence in that section also needs a bit of clarification. Here's patch with that change. Please feel free to reject it or apply it. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
Commits
-
Doc: Improve logical replication failover documentation.
- 5d9e675b36b5 18.0 landed
- 24f608625f9a 19 (unreleased) landed
- f2e41d9e2fb0 17.6 landed