Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-07-09T13:19:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have split your top up patch into 2 - one related to the document
> > change being the subject of this thread and the other for fixing the
> > query. Committer may squash the patch, if they think so.
> >
>
> The changes look good to me.

Thanks.

Looks like Amit has already committed it. I had  created a CF entry
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5904/ to track this.  I will
mark it as committed now.

Amit,
While reviewing the patches again, I felt that the second sentence in
that section also needs a bit of clarification. Here's patch with that
change. Please feel free to reject it or apply it.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Commits

  1. Doc: Improve logical replication failover documentation.