Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-08T12:10:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- check-function-return-bms_is_member.txt (text/plain)
Hi. Em sex., 3 de out. de 2025 às 09:13, Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> escreveu: > > On Oct 3 2025, at 4:25 am, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > >> On 3 Oct 2025, at 01:36, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 01:33, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > >>> Another nitpick would be to remove the test for NULL in > test_bms_make_singleton > >>> since that is a STRICT function, making the test for NULL > >>> superfluous code: > >> > >> I see test_random_operations() is also strict. Is it worth getting rid > >> of the SQL NULL checks on the inputs there too? Aka, the attached. > > > > Indeed, but reading the code I wonder if STRICT was a mistake and the > intention > > was to allow NULL input? > > Yes, it was an oversight after I re-worked the random function. > > > That being said, the function is never called with > > NULL so that's mostly academic thinking. +1 for removing the NULL > > checks and simplifying the code. > > I agree, and thank you both for the attention to detail and interest in > this test suite. > With the patch attached, there are regression. Is it intentional not to check the return of the function bms_is_member? diff --strip-trailing-cr -U3 C:/dll/postgres_dev/postgres_commit/src/test/modules/test_bitmapset/expected/test_bitmapset.out C:/dll/postgres_dev/postgres_commit/build/testrun/test_bitmapset/regress/results/test_bitmapset.out --- C:/dll/postgres_dev/postgres_commit/src/test/modules/test_bitmapset/expected/test_bitmapset.out 2025-10-02 21:17:53.169515700 -0300 +++ C:/dll/postgres_dev/postgres_commit/build/testrun/test_bitmapset/regress/results/test_bitmapset.out 2025-10-07 21:24:00.534142300 -0300 @@ -1570,9 +1570,5 @@ -- random operations SELECT test_random_operations(-1, 10000, 81920, 0) > 0 AS result; - result --------- - t -(1 row) - +ERROR: union missing member 63904 DROP EXTENSION test_bitmapset; best regards, Ranier Vilela
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Minor fixes for test_bitmapset.c
- 5142f0093e64 19 (unreleased) landed
-
test_bitmapset: Improve random function
- 9d46b86529e8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add mem_exceeded_count column to pg_stat_replication_slots.
- d3b6183dd988 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Tidy-up unneeded NULL parameter checks from SQL function
- a69b55cd4727 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove check for NULL in STRICT function
- 381f5cffae00 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fixes for comments in test_bitmapset
- a1b064e4b226 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Minor fixups of test_bitmapset.c
- 3a6615806859 19 (unreleased) landed
-
test_bitmapset: Simplify code of the module
- 9952f6c05a40 19 (unreleased) landed
-
test_bitmapset: Expand more the test coverage
- 5668fff3c512 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix compiler warnings in test_bitmapset
- f83fe65f3fc1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test module for Bitmapset
- 00c3d87a5cab 19 (unreleased) landed