Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c)

Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-01T19:58:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Use safe string copy routine

Attachments

Em seg., 1 de jul. de 2024 às 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
escreveu:

> > On 1 Jul 2024, at 21:15, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > On 2024-Jul-01, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> >>> -       char            name[MAXPGPATH + 1];
> >>> +       char            name[MAXPGPATH];/* backup label name */
> >>>
> >>> With the introduced use of strlcpy, why do we need to change this
> field?
> >>>
> >> The part about being the only reference in the entire code that uses
> >> MAXPGPATH + 1.
> >
> > The bit I don't understand about this discussion is what will happen
> > with users that currently have exactly 1024 chars in backup names today.
> > With this change, we'll be truncating their names to 1023 chars instead.
> > Why would they feel that such change is welcome?
>
> That's precisely what I was getting at.  Maybe it makes sense to change,
> maybe
> not, but that's not for this patch to decide as that's a different
> discussion
> from using safe string copying API's.
>
Ok, this is not material for the proposal and can be considered unrelated.

We only have to replace it with strlcpy.

v7 attached.

best regards,
Ranier Vilela