Re: slab allocator performance issues

Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Date: 2021-07-20T14:24:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 às 11:15, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 10:04, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps you would agree with me that in the most absolute of times,
> malloc will not fail.
> > So it makes more sense to test:
> > if (ret != NULL)
> > than
> > if (ret == NULL)
>
> I think it'd be better to use unlikely() for that.
>
Sure, it can be, but in this case, there is no way to reduce the scope.

regards,
Ranier Vilela

Commits

  1. Improve the performance of the slab memory allocator