Re: slab allocator performance issues
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Date: 2021-07-20T14:24:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 às 11:15, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> escreveu: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 10:04, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps you would agree with me that in the most absolute of times, > malloc will not fail. > > So it makes more sense to test: > > if (ret != NULL) > > than > > if (ret == NULL) > > I think it'd be better to use unlikely() for that. > Sure, it can be, but in this case, there is no way to reduce the scope. regards, Ranier Vilela
Commits
-
Improve the performance of the slab memory allocator
- d21ded75fdbc 16.0 landed