Re: Avoid possible memory leak (src/common/rmtree.c)
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-07-31T23:10:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Em sex, 28 de jul de 2023 11:54 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:45:22PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > Skimming the tree there doesn't seem to be any callers which aren't > exiting or > > ereporting on failure so the real-world impact seems low. That being > said, > > silencing static analyzers could be reason enough to delay allocation. > > A different reason would be out-of-core code that uses rmtree() in a > memory context where the leak would be an issue if facing a failure > continuously? Delaying the allocation after the OPENDIR() seems like > a good practice anyway. > Thanks for the commit, Michael. best regards, Ranier Vilela
Commits
-
Avoid memory leak in rmtree() when path cannot be opened
- f1e9f6bbfa53 17.0 landed