Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c)
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-24T01:34:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Use safe string copy routine
- e930c872b65c 18.0 landed
Attachments
- v3-avoid-incomplete-copy-string-do_pg_backup_start.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v3
Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 22:14, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu: > Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 22:05, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> > escreveu: > >> Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 21:54, Michael Paquier < >> michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 09:34:45PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: >>> > It's not critical code, so I think it's ok to use strlen, even because >>> the >>> > result of strlen will already be available using modern compilers. >>> > >>> > So, I think it's ok to use memcpy with strlen + 1. >>> >>> It seems to me that there is a pretty good argument to just use >>> strlcpy() for the same reason as the one you cite: this is not a >>> performance-critical code, and that's just safer. >>> >> Yeah, I'm fine with strlcpy. I'm not against it. >> > Perhaps, like the v2? > > Either v1 or v2, to me, looks good. > Thinking about, does not make sense the field size MAXPGPATH + 1. all other similar fields are just MAXPGPATH. If we copy MAXPGPATH + 1, it will also be wrong. So it is necessary to adjust logbackup.h as well. So, I think that v3 is ok to fix. best regards, Ranier Vilela > > best regards, > Ranier Vilela > >>