Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c)
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
From: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-01T19:47:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Use safe string copy routine
- e930c872b65c 18.0 landed
Em seg., 1 de jul. de 2024 às 16:15, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> escreveu: > On 2024-Jul-01, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > > > - char name[MAXPGPATH + 1]; > > > + char name[MAXPGPATH];/* backup label name */ > > > > > > With the introduced use of strlcpy, why do we need to change this > field? > > > > > The part about being the only reference in the entire code that uses > > MAXPGPATH + 1. > > The bit I don't understand about this discussion is what will happen > with users that currently have exactly 1024 chars in backup names today. > With this change, we'll be truncating their names to 1023 chars instead. > Why would they feel that such change is welcome? > Yes of course, I understand. This can be a problem for users. best regards, Ranier Vilela