Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1

Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>

From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-28T08:16:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

Hi Hackers,

While reviewing [1], it makes me recall an experience where I had a patch
ready locally, but CommitFest CI failed with a shadows-variable warning.
Now I understand that -Wall doesn't by default enable -Wshadows with some
compilers like clang.

I did a clean build with manually enabling -Wshadow and surprisingly found
there are a lot of such warnings in the current code base, roughly ~200
occurrences.

As there are too many, I plan to fix them all in 3-4 rounds. For round 1
patch, I'd see any objection, then decide if to proceed more rounds.

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsF8R0Bt4J3c92+T2F0mun0rRfK=-
GH+iBv2s-O8ahJJw@mail.gmail.com

Best regards,
Chao Li (Evan)
---------------------
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix new-to-v19 -Wshadow warnings

  2. Reduce scope of for-loop-local variables to avoid shadowing

  3. Fix local-variable shadowing in pg_trgm's printSourceNFA().