Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete

Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>

From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-13T03:56:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

Sorry, I missed the attachment.

Chao Li (Evan)
---------------------
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/


On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 11:55 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Nov 5, 2025, at 23:46, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> I committed the patches 0001 and 0002 (from v59).
>
>
> I just noticed 0001 and 0002 have been pushed, and my comments 3&4 on 0002
> had been fixed in the pushed version.
>
> So, I created a patch to fix the typo of my comment 1. As the fix is
> really trivial, I am fine either merging it or leaving it to Paul for next
> updates.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Chao Li (Evan)
> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
> https://www.highgo.com/
>
>
>
>
>

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Make ExecForPortionOfLeftovers() obey SRF protocol.

  2. Add isolation tests for UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION OF

  3. Add UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION OF

  4. Record range constructor functions in pg_range

  5. Add range_minus_multi and multirange_minus_multi functions

  6. doc: Add section for temporal tables

  7. Add assertion check for WAL receiver state during stream-archive transition