Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> That way you don't have to opt in to BufFile's >> double buffering and segmentation schemes just to get shared file >> clean-up, if for some reason you want direct file handles. > > Is that something that you really think is possible? It's pretty far fetched, but maybe shared temporary relation files accessed via smgr.c/md.c? Or maybe future things that don't want to read/write through a buffer but instead want to mmap it. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Support parallel btree index builds.
- 9da0cc35284b 11.0 landed
-
Report an ERROR if a parallel worker fails to start properly.
- 2badb5afb89c 11.0 cited
-
Transfer state pertaining to pending REINDEX operations to workers.
- 29d58fd3adae 11.0 landed
-
Add a barrier primitive for synchronizing backends.
- 1145acc70deb 11.0 cited
-
Allow DML commands that create tables to use parallel query.
- e9baa5e9fa14 11.0 cited
-
Refactor GetOldestXmin() to use flags
- af4b1a0869bd 10.0 cited
-
Fix regression in parallel planning against inheritance tables.
- 2609e91fcf9d 10.0 cited
-
Don't create "holes" in BufFiles, in the new logtape code.
- 7ac4a389a7db 10.0 cited
-
Simplify the code for logical tape read buffers.
- b75f467b6eec 10.0 cited
-
Fix excessive memory consumption in the new sort pre-reading code.
- b56fb691b003 10.0 cited
-
Implement binary heap replace-top operation in a smarter way.
- 24598337c8d2 10.0 cited
-
Cosmetic code cleanup in commands/extension.c.
- 25794e841e5b 10.0 cited
-
Speed up planner's scanning for parallel-query hazards.
- da1c91631e35 10.0 cited
-
Read from the same worker repeatedly until it returns no tuple.
- bc7fcab5e36b 9.6.0 cited
-
Improve tuplesort.c to support variable merge order. The original coding
- df700e6b4019 8.2.0 cited