Re: [PATCH v19] GSSAPI encryption support
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Date: 2018-12-03T21:55:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:20 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > (and I have to wonder- if we want nearly all callers of > WaitLatch/WaitLatchOrSocket to use WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH, maybe we should > make that the default and allow it to be overridden..? ... That is what I proposed. It was Heikki who talked me into the opt-in solution, but using an assertion to make sure you handle it one way or the other: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6417314e-93d5-ed2d-9012-8d6e9ed21778%40iki.fi Perhaps I should have sought more opinions. Please feel free to start a new thread on that if you don't like the way it was done. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
GSSAPI encryption support
- b0b39f72b990 12.0 landed
-
Fix typo
- 57c932475504 9.6.0 cited