Re: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-08-13T04:19:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I have some patches sitting around in my workspace that I think are
> non-controversial, and so I was considering just pushing them once
> the tree opens for v11 development.  If anyone thinks they need
> further review, I'll put them into the September commitfest, but
> otherwise we might as well skip the overhead.  These are:
>
> 1. check-hash-bucket-size-against-work_mem-2.patch from
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13698.1487283211@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> That discussion sort of trailed off, but there wasn't really anyone
> saying not to commit it, and no new ideas have surfaced.

+1

I'd vote for including this in v10.  There doesn't seem to be any
downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table
case when we can see it coming.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


Commits

  1. Remove pgbench's restriction on placement of -M switch.