Re: Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-05-18T04:43:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > I had my eyes on the WAL sender code this morning, and I have noticed > that walsender.c is not completely consistent with the PID lookups it > does in walsender.c. In two code paths, the PID value is checked > without holding the WAL sender spin lock (WalSndRqstFileReload and > pg_stat_get_wal_senders), which looks like a very bad idea contrary to > what the new WalSndWaitStopping() does and what InitWalSenderSlot() is > doing for ages. There is also code that accesses shared walsender state without spinlocks over in syncrep.c. I think that file could use a few words of explanation for why it's OK to access pid, state and flush without synchronisation. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Fix locking in WAL receiver/sender shmem state structs
- 572d6ee6d41b 10.0 landed
-
pgstat: add WAL receiver status view & SRF
- b1a9bad9e744 9.6.0 cited