Re: Multi column range partition table

Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>

From: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-07-21T17:34:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17 July 2017 at 17:37, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 July 2017 at 16:34, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do you want to own this open item, then?
>>
> OK.
>
> I need to give the patch another read-through, and then I'll aim to
> push it sometime in the next few days.
>

Committed.

Regards,
Dean


Commits

  1. Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition bounds.

  2. Clarify the contract of partition_rbound_cmp().

  3. Simplify the logic checking new range partition bounds.