Re: Multi column range partition table
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
From: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>,
amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-07-21T17:34:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17 July 2017 at 17:37, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 16:34, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Do you want to own this open item, then? >> > OK. > > I need to give the patch another read-through, and then I'll aim to > push it sometime in the next few days. > Committed. Regards, Dean
Commits
-
Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition bounds.
- d363d42bb9a4 10.0 landed
-
Clarify the contract of partition_rbound_cmp().
- f1dae097f294 10.0 landed
-
Simplify the logic checking new range partition bounds.
- c03911d9454a 10.0 landed